I asked a lot of questions because I sorta kinda understood the stories--but I wasn't there on thursday because I decided to be a bum--and so I would really love to get the informed opinion of you all.
The effects of WWII--well in Harrison Bergeron--WWII was about trying to protect the rights of humans which probably morphed into saying everyone is equal--and then Ayn Rand is always squawking about the acceptance of the mediocre "he tried and that should be enough" vs individual excellence triumphing (Roark, Dagny, Reardon) because of ability and hard work. Also of interesting note: Kurt Vonnegut turned a really frightening and nightmarish future into hilarity. I was cracking up in the computer lab as this genius man has 21-gun salutes going off in his head and weights on him to ensure that he's not using his natural ability to "compete" and be what he is.
Question: What about his writing makes us laugh as we also cringe? Do you see any current manifestations of his theme? (btw--what is he trying to say??) One could say welfare programs, equal opportunity thingees where a certain minority has to be accepted to a college--could those be considered the beginning to the end of competition?
Did not really understand the school story--
Question: Did they kill the animals because they were curious? Did the management of the school keep killing the animals to try to keep the kids from learning about them? despite the fact that these kids were already quite precocious and frightened--reminded me of the beats--questioning, smart, disillusioned but with the hope of innocence or at least revelation "we want to know what it's like...".
I really liked the Esme love and squalor story--the composition was interesting--the beginning reminded me of C.S. Lewis stories, or any of the preWWII British writers--quirky, witty, observational--set against a backdrop of war but not of war--still has all his faculties and convinced he's going to keep them and write this little girl and then come back home and live happily ever after. And then he's no longer a person, he's X--with bleeding gums and a tic. The broken watch really said it all to me--like himself, it might work but he's too frightened of the possiblity of it not working to find to try to wind it up or fix it(himself).
How does the character of the father of the two children compare to the narrator of the story? Do you think the narrator can be fixed?